Re: "Socket destroy delayed" -- is this right?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 24 Dec 1998 10:57:22 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: "Socket destroy delayed" -- is this right?"
Previous message: Andrej Presern: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"

> "Socket destroy delayed" appears if I ping an IP that doesn't respond on
> the localnet and then hit ^C here. If I ping some other IP that goes
> through the default gateway, I don't get any message.

Thats fine. So long as you get maybe 1 or 2 from it then it goes quiet
Its a debug. If it keeps going and going every ten seconds thats a buffer
leak

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andi Kleen: "Re: "Socket destroy delayed" -- is this right?"
Previous message: Andrej Presern: "Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Article: IBM wants to "clean up the license" of Linux"