Re: Cyrix Detection -- NO SMP, please ?????

Gregory Maxwell (linker@z.ml.org)
Tue, 20 Oct 1998 20:29:51 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 20 Oct 1998, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:

> In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.981020125214.28812A-100000@z.ml.org>, Gregory
> Maxwell
> writes:
> +-----
> | I dont think that SMP should be there.. But the kernel should be the most
> | likely to be used one.. This will make sure incompatibilitys happen soon
> | rather then later..
> +--->8
>
> But that implies also loading all possible drivers during the install, etc.;
> but during the install? That's a disaster waiting to happen, not to mention
> a waste of memory (especially since you'd have to do it before swap space
> has been established).

I'm just saying it shouldn't use a radicaly differnt kernel.. Not try all
hardware at boot!

> | Furthermore, it will then be possible to do a zero reboot install on those
> | computers (those=ones that end up using the same as install)..
> +--->8
>
> That one doesn't impress me much, because

> (1) / is on a ramdisk, not the hard drive, during the install... and we've
> already done the initrd thing so we can't use the initrd root hack again.

Hmm.. I suppose we could modify initrd so the trick can be done n times.

> (2) it wouldn't apply to my installs anyway --- I have to deal with little
> things such as AFS.

It would impress the hell out of joe user.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/