Re: LSF and SOCK_PACKET

Mark H. Wood (mwood@IUPUI.Edu)
Mon, 19 Oct 1998 11:44:01 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pete Schwamb: "PCI direct access causes segfault?"
Previous message: Robert M. Hyatt: "Re: NFS error (Maybe off topic)"

Now I'm confused. I thought SOCK_PACKET was going away in favor of
(PF_PACKET,SOCK_RAW)?

On Fri, 16 Oct 1998, Garth R Goodson wrote:
[deletia]
> Has anyone given any thought to having a BIND_TO_TCP_PORT type option
> for SOCK_PACKET?

What would you want this to mean?

-- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@IUPUI.Edu Some things are not improved when made "graphical". Imagine how crude Kilmer's "Trees" would be if reduced to comic-book form.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pete Schwamb: "PCI direct access causes segfault?"
Previous message: Robert M. Hyatt: "Re: NFS error (Maybe off topic)"