Re: jiffies wraparound

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 15:53:11 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: pre-2.1.126-2 sd.c does not build as module"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "[Only Tenuously On Topic] Profibus for Linux - license advice wanted."
Next in thread: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: jiffies wraparound"

> by zero, the 2.1.126 time code survived this quick 'time travel' without
> problems. Apart from processes getting killed during wraparound, there is
> no big problem, is there?

Im losing the entire tty subsystem for good when this occurs

Shrug, Linus hath spoken. Onwards 2.2

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: pre-2.1.126-2 sd.c does not build as module"
Previous message: David Woodhouse: "[Only Tenuously On Topic] Profibus for Linux - license advice wanted."
Next in thread: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: MOLNAR Ingo: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: jiffies wraparound"
Reply: Chris Evans: "Re: jiffies wraparound"