The last time I looked, they wanted a different piece of paper for each
package, and each kind of contribution (documentation, patches, major
work).
Duh. As long as there's no statement that I can sign (preferably
electronically, but let's not be reasonable here :-/ ) which basically
states "I hereby assign to the FSF the copyright to everything at all which
I email to anybody at all with the explicidly stated intent for inclusion
in any work copyrighted by the FSF at all" there won't be a copyright
assignment from me, and therefore all I'm going to provide is patches which
are too small to warrant separate copyrights. Which rules out minor
feature enhancements.
... and I seriously doubt that I'm the only person who thinks that way.
NB: Well, I could dream up some legalese-sounding text which pretends to
say this, but what would be the point?
-- Matthias Urlichs | noris network GmbH | smurf@noris.de | ICQ: 20193661 The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://www.noris.de/~smurf/-- The more cordial the buyers secretary, the greater the odds that the competition already has the order.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/