Re: Linux 2.1.125 & gated - boked

Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:27:15 -0700 (PDT)


Hello Jordan, The double entries in /proc/net/route are probably
because in the rc.d area is an 'route add ....' in one of
the scripts there , that si now auto-matically entered by the
kernel . Hth< JimL

On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Jordan Mendelson wrote:
> Looks like Gated is hosed under 2.1.125. It works just fine under 2.1.118..
> same binary... I've recompiled and gotten a bit farther than I did before..
> anyway, here's the output:
>
> Oct 14 03:31:27 krt_rtread: Initial routes read from kernel (via
> /proc/net/route
> ):
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.154/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> KRT READ REMNANT 208.0.84.154 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> fla
> gs <>0: queueing delete for rt_add() failure
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.187/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> KRT READ REMNANT 208.0.84.187 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> fla
> gs <>0: queueing delete for rt_add() failure
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.200/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> ... [more lines like this]
> KRT SEND DELETE 208.0.84.180 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 208.0.84.215 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 206.105.188 mask 0.0.0.0 router 206.105.188.4
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 206.105.188 mask 0.0.0.0 router 206.105.188.4
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
>
> What's odd is it's refering to the gateway address as the virtual interface,
> and the mask is completely off. What changed? I checked /proc/net/route...
> and the sscanf function shouldn't have any problems. Another odd thing is, I
> appear to have two routing entries which are exactly the same in
> /proc/net/route:
>
> eth0 00BC69CE 00000000 0001 0 0 0
> 00FFFFFF
> 0 0 0
> eth0 00BC69CE 00000000 0001 0 0 0
> 00FFFFFF
> 0 0 0
>
> I'm pretty sure this sort of behavior shouldn't be allowed :)
>
> Anyway, it's sort of important than I get OSPF up and running again, so I'd
> appreciate it if someone could tell me what possibly could have changed to
> affected gated this badly. If someone has a patch to make my life easier,
> I'd appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Jordan
>
> --
> Jordan Mendelson : http://jordy.wserv.com
> Web Services, Inc. : http://www.wserv.com
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

, JimL
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@baby-dragons.com |
| System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Des-Moines, WA 98198 |
| Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/