Re: TCP Stalls.

Thomas Molina (tmolina@probe.net)
Wed, 2 Sep 1998 07:46:43 -0500 (CDT)


What about an adaptation of AX.25? It handles loaded radio frequencies
and "line quality" issues rather well I think.

On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
> The problem with TCP over PPP links where you have noise and occasional
> -non traffic load related- loss is that TCP isn't designed to cope with
> that. It was designed for networks where packets get lost due to
> collisions under high load or where heavily loaded routers drop packets
> that they don't have time to process. Unfortunately when you lose a
> packet in TCP the fundamental model is that "oh, the link must be
> congested, I'll slow down to help it out." Time consuming modem
> renegotiations on semi-good phone lines don't help this problem any..
>
> Design a protocol that can deal with both load related packet loss and
> point-to-point line quality related packet loss over a single link and
> the world will love you forever.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html