Re: Wheee.. 2.1.108ac2

Thomas Molina (
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 06:17:04 -0500 (CDT)

I thought the acX patches were serial (i.e. patch with ac1 then ac2,
etc). Does this mean we should ignore 108ac1 and apply ac2 to a clean
2.1.108 source tree?

On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> Ok I had a corrupted patch-2.1.107 somehow (probably from editing it when
> patching), anyway 2.1.108ac2 seems to cleanly patch into the original tree.
> We apologise for the inconvenience

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to