Re: Corruption in 2.1.106

=?iso-8859-1?Q?menion=99?= (menion@mindless.com)
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 11:38:29 -0600


>
> Are other people seeing 2.1.106 corrupting disks and memory on x86 ?
>
> Alan

This is an example after 2 days of running: I frequently do this, and
this is a good one. After 6 - 8 days I typically have 10 - 20 inodes
with zero dtime. My root FS is the worst affected, but then it get's
the most reading/writing attention. There is another error that is
wuite freqent, but I can't recall it. (I just got this after reading
your message and trying it out on my root filesystem.

..[snip]..
Parallelizing fsck version 1.10 (24-Apr-97)
e2fsck 1.10, 24-Apr-97 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Deleted inode 14510 has zero dtime. Fix<y>? yes

Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Fix summary information<y>? yes

Block bitmap differences: -60618 -60619 -60620 -60621 -60622 -60623
-60624
-60625 -60626 -60627 -60628 -60629. FIXED
Free blocks count wrong for group 7 (1183, counted=1195). FIXED
Free blocks count wrong (214664, counted=214676). FIXED
Inode bitmap differences: -14510. FIXED
Free inodes count wrong for group #7 (1805, counted=1806). FIXED
Free inodes count wrong (221839, counted=221840). FIXED

/dev/hda1: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/hda1: 45400/267240 files (3.7% non-contiguous), 850748/1065424
blocks
..[snip]..

thx..js

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu