[Michael Chastain wrote:]
> > It is convenient and it does save hours of compile time. But I think
> > it's a new feature, and as a new feature, it doesn't belong in 2.0.XX.
>
> I tend to agree (for now anyway)
Yes, it's a feature, but it's not really touching the code directly.. My
reasoning was that, even if the dependencies failed to trigger
recompilation of the code, people doing the recommended
> make clean; make dep; make zImage
would not be affected.
Anyway, it's entirely your decision.
> > Of course I defer to Alan Cox as the arbiter of what belongs in 2.0.XX.
>
> Do take the trouble to call me names when I make a silyl choice though
:-)
Thanks,
Ion
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu