Looks good here; TCP performance is up. I've only done a once-over, though,
and haven't had a chance to benchmark against pre-2.1.89 numbers.
>
> pre-90 does a few other minor things, like for example getting rid of
> kerneld because the new kmod thing is a lot simpler in many ways. Let's
> see what the reaction to that is, but I'm fairly certain that this was a
> major good thing: I've personally never liked kerneld, but kmod seems to
> be a much nicer and more controlled way of handling the same issues that
> kerneld tried to do.
Works fine here.
The scheduler hack seems to be a win, subjectively, but I have no timings to
back up that feeling.
Some compilation issues with 2.1.89 have been fixed, too.
Overall, this seems like a big winner.
-Sumner
-- rage, rage against the dying of the light- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu