If we compress, the pages on disk are variable sized, once you've paged
in and out a few hundred times we could easilly fragment the swap space to
hell :).
Then what ?, stall while we defragment the swap space.
Keep it simple.
Peter
On 20-Feb-98 docwhat@gerf.org ;The Doctor What wrote:
> Telephone Game! Rik van Riel said (on 01:19 AM 2/20/98 +0100):
> ->Sorry Jim and Adam, compressed swap has already been
> ->implemented and tried. The results were:
> ->- more CPU spent on swapping --> slower system
> ->- more I/O spent on swapping because the I/O patterns
> -> became more complex than normal swap --> slower system
>
> Can't optimize this by compressing on a per page basis? I'm not overly
> familiar with the theory, but it seems that there is less to compress
> (yeah, the compression isn't as good) and less for the CPU to worry about.
>
> Hmmm.... If only there was intellegent hardware that could do this for
> us...
>
> Just an Idea
> -=Doc
> --
> "There are monkey boys in the facility."
> --Yoyodyne Comm System (Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai)
> The Doctor What: Need I say more? http://www.gerf.org/~docwhat/
> docwhat@gerf.org (finger docwhat@gerf.org for PGP key)
> PGPkey Fingerprint: EA 4C 8C FC 5C F0 14 78 9C 02 B9 A1 83 54 7C 8D
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
----------------------------------
E-Mail: P.Waltenberg@irl.cri.nz
Date: 20-Feb-98
Time: 15:34:44
----------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu