Nope. time_t is defined as signed, and touch and ctime() are doing
exactly the right thing. If there is an error, it is in the ext2
kernel code. Having a signed time_t is a Good Thing[TM], especially
since once expanded to 64 bits it can pretty much represent all of
time; if it was unsigned it would be limited to 1970 and after.
-hpa
--
PGP: 2047/2A960705 BA 03 D3 2C 14 A8 A8 BD 1E DF FE 69 EE 35 BD 74
See http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/ for web page and full PGP public key
I am Bahá'í -- ask me about it or see http://www.bahai.org/
"To love another person is to see the face of God." -- Les Misérables
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu