Re: 2.1.x and smbfs

Christopher Faylor (cgf@bbc.com)
Mon, 12 Jan 1998 01:00:01 GMT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: devfs"
Maybe in reply to: David Burrows: "2.1.x and smbfs"

In article <34B8EDFC.E1EF72F0@star.net>, Bill Hawes <whawes@star.net> wrote:
>David Burrows wrote:
>
>> Any chance of an updated smbmount that actually works? Or even a package
>> with smbclient and smbmount binaries in it?
>>
>> Is it going to stay like this for 2.2? I sure hope not.. :P Someone
>> please let us know what is being done about the smbfs mount tools.
>
>The latest work I've heard is that the smbfs mount patches have been
>merged into the smbclient sources and will appear in the next Samba
>alpha release.

Actually, I think they are already in the recent release of smbfs-1.9.18.

-- 
http://www.bbc.com/	cgf@bbc.com			"Strange how unreal
VMS=>UNIX Solutions	Boston Business Computing	 the real can be."

Previous message: Albert D. Cahalan: "Re: devfs"
Maybe in reply to: David Burrows: "2.1.x and smbfs"