Re: Linux 2.0 and 2.1 stability..

Adam McKee (amckee@poboxes.com)
Fri, 31 Oct 1997 09:09:39 -0600 (CST)

> At least, I'll have a chance to try out all the jucy patches that are only
> being maintained for the stable kernel (like raid[1,5] and QNX (the 2.1
> ver dies with SMP) and others)..

I'll see about fixing the 2.1 QNX patch. It may just be a locking issue.
What is the exact manner of death with 2.1 SMP? What really hurts is I
don't have an SMP box. I'm always tempted to get one, and I always wuss
out when I see how expensive the mainboards are. Looks like SMP is going
to be pretty sweet with 2.2 though -- I may just bite the bullet next time
I go hardware shopping.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam McKee phone: (306) 343-0881 (home)
Programmer/Analyst (306) 933-1544 (work)
SED Systems, Inc. email: amckee@poboxes.com
===============================================================================
Just say NO to IE 4.0. <http://www.sun.com/announcement/>
===============================================================================