Re: Ugh in 2.1.60

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@cam.ac.uk)
Fri, 31 Oct 1997 15:10:19 +0000

whawes@star.net said:
> That sounds good -- maybe print just one message, and identify the
> file and line number. It would be good to get this all cleared up
> before 2.2.

Isn't it a bit difficult to get "file and line number" information?
Personally, I liked the approach that I saw in a recent 2.1 kernel:

if (code has done somthing wrong)
*(int *)0=0;

I've forgotten where it was now, but it definitely made sure the offending
code was fixed :)