Re: glibc 2, and Linux 2.x

Mark Habersack (grendel@hoth.amu.edu.pl)
Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:38:24 +0200 (MET DST)


On 31 Jul 1997, Matthias Urlichs wrote:

> Teunis Peters <teunis@usa.net> writes:
> >
> > Sure wish glibc could keep up with the kernel.
> >
> It's intended to, at least the parts that are applicable to more than one
> program. For instance, it's reasonable to expect modutils or e2fsprogs to
> have some difficulty adapting to glibc, but things like ping should get
> along without requiring any kernel headers. Which is a Good Thing.
Just my two cents here. I have compiled bot e2fsprogs and modutils with glibc
and had no serious problems.