Re: Transparent proxying?

Jacek Zapala (jacek@cs.unipos.com.pl)
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:06:26 +0200 (MET DST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Paul Hancock: "Re: 3Com 3c900 is "unknown device" in patched 2.0.29 (or 2.0.30)"
Previous message: zeus: "Re: Solaris source"
Maybe in reply to: Tuomo Pyhala: "Transparent proxying?"

> The IP masq patch against 2.0.30 is low priority stuff which is unlikely
> to affect a running system. This is *not* the reason for the difference
> between the working and not working transparent proxy systems.

> [The patches against 2.0.30 are also in the 2.0.31 dev tree - basically
> they consist of a kmalloc check for ipautofw and a modification of
> masquerading port allocation so that it will always work if there are
> any free ports available]

Is there a patch that repairs broken transparent proxy in 2.0.30? If so,
where can I find it? (I tried hotbot.com, with no results.)

Jacek Zapala

Next message: Paul Hancock: "Re: 3Com 3c900 is "unknown device" in patched 2.0.29 (or 2.0.30)"
Previous message: zeus: "Re: Solaris source"
Maybe in reply to: Tuomo Pyhala: "Transparent proxying?"