Re: Solaris source

zeus (zeus@tomserver.phys.ttu.edu)
Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:06:52 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jacek Zapala: "Re: Transparent proxying?"
Previous message: Tim Hollebeek: "Re: Kernel: Unable to load interpreter"
Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "Solaris source"

err this I believe is a one-way thing (i think that is what he means).
Linux can of course compete with a commercial os, and possible steal all
of that os's customers causing it to run into the ground. A commercial
product is not going to cause the linux programmers to go bank-rupt
though since they are not being paid to work on linux in the first
place. I believe that was the point.

Systemkennung Linux wrote:
>
> > effort which I wholeheartedly support. Besides, how can a commercial
> > product compete with linux?
>
> Mark William's Coherent, a entry level UNIX-like OS was more or less
> blown out of the market by Linux. Do you still believe that Linux can
> not compete with a commercial product?
>
> Ralf

Next message: Jacek Zapala: "Re: Transparent proxying?"
Previous message: Tim Hollebeek: "Re: Kernel: Unable to load interpreter"
Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "Solaris source"