Re: CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT

Philip Blundell (pjb27@cam.ac.uk)
Fri, 11 Apr 1997 21:42:03 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Seth M. Landsman: "Re: Kernel testing"
Previous message: nerull: "linux-2.1.33 compile probs..."
In reply to: Bob Tracy - TDS: "CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT"
Next in thread: Tim Waugh: "Re: CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT"

On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Bob Tracy - TDS wrote:

> inconsistencies/problems... If you select "parallel port support"
> (CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT), it appears that you *must* also select
> "plug and play support" (CONFIG_PNP) and "auto-probe for parallel

Duh. I guess I ought to be taken out and shot.

This patch may help. That's parport's PNP roots showing through again.
*sigh*

retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 Makefile
--- linux/drivers/Makefile 1997/04/11 15:12:46 1.2
+++ linux/drivers/Makefile 1997/04/11 20:38:51
@@ -18,6 +18,11 @@
ifdef CONFIG_PNP
SUB_DIRS += pnp
MOD_SUB_DIRS += pnp
+else
+ ifdef CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT
+ SUB_DIRS += pnp
+ MOD_SUB_DIRS += pnp
+ endif
endif

ifdef CONFIG_SBUS

Next message: Seth M. Landsman: "Re: Kernel testing"
Previous message: nerull: "linux-2.1.33 compile probs..."
In reply to: Bob Tracy - TDS: "CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT"
Next in thread: Tim Waugh: "Re: CONFIG_PNP_PARPORT"