Re: 2.1.6 vs. 2.0.23

Ricardo Kleemann (ricardo@americasnet.com)
Tue, 29 Oct 1996 12:50:40 -0800

On 29 Oct 1996, Alexander Sanda wrote:

> Well, 2.1.6 compiles without problems (including sound support), so I
> did some benchmarking against 2.0.23.
>
> NOTE: I'am running 2.0.23 with Robert L. Krawitz's fast-pentium-memcpy
> patch, so the results for 2.0.23 may be a little bit better than
> expected.
>
Is this patch going to be incorporated into the kernel? Or where can I
get it? Is it good on a pentium as well as PPro?

Ricardo