Re: Not a bible thumper. . .

Arthur D. Jerijian (celestra@ix.netcom.com)
Wed, 17 Jul 1996 05:18:10 GMT


This is too hilarious. I say we LEAVE them in the kernel. After all,
Linux is supposed to be fun, remember?

--Arthur

On Mon, 15 Jul 1996 18:39:44 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:

>I just did a few 'find's because I was curious.. I'm not suggesting that we
>change these, just something to chew on. The only one that reaches the user is
>the UFS driver.

>./fs/isofs/inode.c:/* Some dipshit decided to store some other bit of informatio
>n in the high
>./drivers/cdrom/mcd.c: that are supposedly "OUT OF TOLERANCE" (but are really sh
>itty presses!)
>./arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c: * else we eat shit later big time.
>./arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c: * this shit off... nice job Fujitsu.
>./fs/ufs/ufs_super.c: printk("ufs_read_super: fucking Sun blows me\n");
>./lib/vsprintf.c: * Wirzenius wrote this portably, Torvalds fucked it up :-)
>./drivers/cdrom/sbpcd.c: CURRENT=req->next; /* task can fuck it up GTL
>*/
>./arch/sparc/kernel/process.c: /* fuck me plenty */
>./arch/sparc/kernel/sunos_ioctl.c: /* Binary compatibility is good American know
>how fuckin' up. */