Re: bdflush/update no longer necessary?

Tony Nugent (tonyn@sctnugen.ppp.gu.edu.au)
Sat, 24 Feb 1996 11:28:47 +1000


So wrote Jauder Ho <jauderho@umich.edu> on Wed, 21 Feb 1996:

> So has anyone found out whether doing /sbin/update -0 60 works better?

Several people have mentioned that it does give them better results,
but your milage may vary.

> > > the kernel. The code in the kernel looks as if it could replace the old
> > > update/bdflush daemon.
> >
> > Certainly not. The new kernel thread replaces the bdflush process of
> > the user-land update/bdflush. You still have to run update. You do not
> > have to change anything to your setup.

Cheers
Tony
-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-
T.Nugent@sct.gu.edu.au tonyn@sctnugen.ppp.gu.edu.au
Brisbane Queensland Australia
-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-=*#*=-
It takes a long time to grow on an old friend.
JOHN LEONARD