Re:

From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Thu Mar 07 2024 - 03:01:42 EST

Next message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: add cell count properties to usb0"
Previous message: Sagi Grimberg: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] nvme: constify struct class usage"
In reply to: KR Kim: "[no subject]"
Next in thread: Kyeongrho . Kim: "RE: Re:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi,

kr.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 7 Mar 2024 15:07:29 +0900:

> Feat: Add SkyHigh Memory Patch code
>
> Add SPI Nand Patch code of SkyHigh Memory
> - Add company dependent code with 'skyhigh.c'
> - Insert into 'core.c' so that 'always ECC on'

Patch formatting is still messed up.

> commit 6061b97a830af8cb5fd0917e833e779451f9046a (HEAD -> master)
> Author: KR Kim <kr.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu Mar 7 13:24:11 2024 +0900
>
> SPI Nand Patch code of SkyHigh Momory
>
> Signed-off-by: KR Kim <kr.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> From 6061b97a830af8cb5fd0917e833e779451f9046a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KR Kim <kr.kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 13:24:11 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] SPI Nand Patch code of SkyHigh Memory
>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 7 +-
> drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 3 +
> 4 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c
> mode change 100644 => 100755 include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index 19cc77288ebb..1e61ab21893a
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> spinand-objs := core.o alliancememory.o ato.o esmt.o foresee.o gigadevice.o macronix.o
> -spinand-objs += micron.o paragon.o toshiba.o winbond.o xtx.o
> +spinand-objs += micron.o paragon.o skyhigh.o toshiba.o winbond.o xtx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NAND) += spinand.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index e0b6715e5dfe..e3f0a7544ba4
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static int spinand_read_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 *val)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 val)
> +int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 val)

Please do this in a separate commit.

> {
> struct spi_mem_op op = SPINAND_SET_FEATURE_OP(reg,
> spinand->scratchbuf);
> @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ static int spinand_init_quad_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> static int spinand_ecc_enable(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> bool enable)
> {
> + /* SHM : always ECC enable */
> + if (spinand->flags & SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY)
> + return 0;

Silently always enabling ECC is not possible. If you cannot disable the
on-die engine, then:
- you should prevent any other engine type to be used
- you should error out if a raw access is requested
- these chips are broken, IMO

> +
> return spinand_upd_cfg(spinand, CFG_ECC_ENABLE,
> enable ? CFG_ECC_ENABLE : 0);
> }
> @@ -945,6 +949,7 @@ static const struct spinand_manufacturer *spinand_manufacturers[] = {
> &macronix_spinand_manufacturer,
> &micron_spinand_manufacturer,
> &paragon_spinand_manufacturer,
> + &skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer,
> &toshiba_spinand_manufacturer,
> &winbond_spinand_manufacturer,
> &xtx_spinand_manufacturer,
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..92e7572094ff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/skyhigh.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2022 SkyHigh Memory Limited
> + *
> + * Author: Takahiro Kuwano <takahiro.kuwano@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mtd/spinand.h>
> +
> +#define SPINAND_MFR_SKYHIGH 0x01
> +
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_1TO2_BITFLIPS (1 << 4)
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_3TO6_BITFLIPS (2 << 4)
> +#define SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR (3 << 4)
> +
> +#define SKYHIGH_CONFIG_PROTECT_EN BIT(1)
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 4, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(false, 0, 1, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(write_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(true, 0, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(true, 0, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(update_cache_variants,
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(false, 0, NULL, 0),
> + SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(false, 0, NULL, 0));
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> +{
> + if (section)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + /* SkyHigh's ecc parity is stored in the internal hidden area and is not needed for them. */

ECC an

"needed" is wrong here. Just stop after "area"

> + region->length = 0;
> + region->offset = mtd->oobsize;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> + struct mtd_oob_region *region)
> +{
> + if (section)
> + return -ERANGE;
> +
> + region->length = mtd->oobsize - 2;
> + region->offset = 2;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout = {
> + .ecc = skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_ecc,
> + .free = skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout_free,
> +};
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
> + u8 status)
> +{
> + /* SHM
> + * 00 : No bit-flip
> + * 01 : 1-2 errors corrected
> + * 10 : 3-6 errors corrected
> + * 11 : uncorrectable
> + */

Thanks for the comment but the switch case looks rather
straightforward, it is self-sufficient in this case.

> +
> + switch (status & STATUS_ECC_MASK) {
> + case STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS:
> + return 0;
> +
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_1TO2_BITFLIPS:
> + return 2;
> +
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_3TO6_BITFLIPS:
> + return 6;
> +
> + case SKYHIGH_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR:
> + return -EBADMSG;;
> +
> + default:
> + break;

I guess you can directly call return -EINVAL here?

> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct spinand_info skyhigh_spinand_table[] = {
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML01G301",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x15),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 64, 64, 1024, 20, 1, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML01G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x14),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 1024, 20, 1, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML02G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x25),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 2048, 40, 2, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> + SPINAND_INFO("S35ML04G300",
> + SPINAND_ID(SPINAND_READID_METHOD_OPCODE_DUMMY, 0x35),
> + NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 4096, 80, 2, 1, 1),
> + NAND_ECCREQ(6, 32),
> + SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants,
> + &write_cache_variants,
> + &update_cache_variants),
> + SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY,
> + SPINAND_ECCINFO(&skyhigh_spinand_ooblayout,
> + skyhigh_spinand_ecc_get_status)),
> +};
> +
> +static int skyhigh_spinand_init(struct spinand_device *spinand)
> +{
> + return spinand_write_reg_op(spinand, REG_BLOCK_LOCK,
> + SKYHIGH_CONFIG_PROTECT_EN);

Is this really relevant? Isn't there an API for the block lock
mechanism?

> +}
> +
> +static const struct spinand_manufacturer_ops skyhigh_spinand_manuf_ops = {
> + .init = skyhigh_spinand_init,
> + };
> +
> +const struct spinand_manufacturer skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer = {
> + .id = SPINAND_MFR_SKYHIGH,
> + .name = "SkyHigh",
> + .chips = skyhigh_spinand_table,
> + .nchips = ARRAY_SIZE(skyhigh_spinand_table),
> + .ops = &skyhigh_spinand_manuf_ops,
> +};
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index badb4c1ac079..0e135076df24
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ extern const struct spinand_manufacturer gigadevice_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer macronix_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer micron_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer paragon_spinand_manufacturer;
> +extern const struct spinand_manufacturer skyhigh_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer toshiba_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer winbond_spinand_manufacturer;
> extern const struct spinand_manufacturer xtx_spinand_manufacturer;
> @@ -312,6 +313,7 @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
>
> #define SPINAND_HAS_QE_BIT BIT(0)
> #define SPINAND_HAS_CR_FEAT_BIT BIT(1)
> +#define SPINAND_ON_DIE_ECC_MANDATORY BIT(2) /* SHM */

If we go this route, then "mandatory" is not relevant here, we shall
convey the fact that the on-die ECC engine cannot be disabled and as
mentioned above, there are other impacts.

>
> /**
> * struct spinand_ondie_ecc_conf - private SPI-NAND on-die ECC engine structure
> @@ -518,5 +520,6 @@ int spinand_match_and_init(struct spinand_device *spinand,
>
> int spinand_upd_cfg(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 mask, u8 val);
> int spinand_select_target(struct spinand_device *spinand, unsigned int target);
> +int spinand_write_reg_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 reg, u8 val);
>
> #endif /* __LINUX_MTD_SPINAND_H */

Thanks,
Miquèl

Next message: Krzysztof Kozlowski: "Re: [PATCH] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: add cell count properties to usb0"
Previous message: Sagi Grimberg: "Re: [PATCH 0/3] nvme: constify struct class usage"
In reply to: KR Kim: "[no subject]"
Next in thread: Kyeongrho . Kim: "RE: Re:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]