Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcat() return code and size usage

[Rodrigo Campos]

On 2/13/24 08:02, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 12:16:06AM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > On 2/11/24 11:48, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Rodrigo,
> I've read it as well and I don't interpret it the same way. I'm reading it
> as "if dst doesn't contain a NUL char before size, its length is considered
> to be size", and the reason is explicitly explained just after:

Very true, I mixed dst and source. Thanks!

> > How are you measuring it there?
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not familiar with this :)
>
> Oh, sorry for not providing the detalis! I just remove "static" in front
> of the function. 

Thanks for the examples and heuristics to keep code small :)

> > I've been playing, but as I can't measure the size, I'm not sure what is
> > really better. I'd like to play a little once I know how to measure it :)
>
> Be careful not to spend too much time on it, nm --size and objdump are
> quickly addictive ;-)

Haha, it is definitely addictive.


I'll share some new versions in a minute.