Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools/nolibc: Fix strlcat() return code and size usage

[Rodrigo Campos]

On 2/11/24 11:48, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> For me it's 58 bytes, or 19 less / 25% smaller, and at first glance it
> should do the right thing as well.

Oh, here I get almost the same (57 bytes), so it must be the example we 
are compiling what is different.

I'll check this after some sleep :)