Re: [REGRESSION] Perf (userspace) broken on big.LITTLE systems since v6.5

From: Mark Rutland
Date: Tue Nov 21 2023 - 10:56:30 EST


On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 07:41:17AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Hi Marc,

Hi Ian,

> I'm unclear if you are running a newer perf tool on an older kernel or
> not. In any case I'll assume the kernel and perf tool versions match.
> In Linux 6.6 this patch was added to the ARM PMU:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c?id=5c816728651ae425954542fed64d21d40cb75a9f
>
> My guess is that the apple_icestorm_pmu requires a similar patch.

The apple_icestorm_pmu PMU driver uses the arm_pmu framework, so it's using
that code (since v6.6).

> The perf tool is supposed to not use extended types when they aren't
> supported:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/tree/tools/perf/util/pmus.c?h=perf-tools-next#n532

How does that is_event_supported() check actually work? I suspect that's giving
the wrong answer.

Regardless, I think the tool is doing something semantically wrong, see below.

> So I share your confusion as to why something broke.
>
> PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE is a legacy type where there are hardcoded type and
> config values that correspond to an event. The PMU driver turns legacy
> events into the real types. On BIG.little systems if the legacy events
> are monitoring a task a different event is needed for each PMU (ie >1
> event). In your example you are monitoring 'ls', a task, and so
> different cycles events are necessary. In the high 32-bits (the
> extended type) the PMU is identified.

I think the interesting thing here is that the tool is mapping events with an
explicit PMU into legacy PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events, which is the opposite
direction than intended. Regardless of whether PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events can be
targetted to a specific PMU, if the user has requested to use a specific PMU we
should be using that PMU and related event namespace.

Marc's command line was:

sudo taskset -c 0 ./perf stat -vvv \
-e apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/ \
-e apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/ \
-e cycles \
ls

... and so the apple_*_pmu events should target their respective PMUs, and the
plain 'cycles' event could legitimately be opened as a single
PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE event, or split into two directed PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events
targetting the two PMUs.

However, thwe tool opens three (undirected?) PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE events:

Opening: apple_icestorm_pmu/cycles/
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
size 136
config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES)
sample_type IDENTIFIER
read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING
disabled 1
inherit 1
enable_on_exec 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------
sys_perf_event_open: pid 1045843 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 3
Opening: apple_firestorm_pmu/cycles/
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
size 136
config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES)
sample_type IDENTIFIER
read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING
disabled 1
inherit 1
enable_on_exec 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------
sys_perf_event_open: pid 1045843 cpu -1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 4
Opening: cycles
------------------------------------------------------------
perf_event_attr:
type 0 (PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE)
size 136
config 0 (PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES)
sample_type IDENTIFIER
read_format TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING
disabled 1
inherit 1
enable_on_exec 1
exclude_guest 1
------------------------------------------------------------

Mark.