Re: Radeon regression in 6.6 kernel

[Bagas Sanjaya]

On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 04:47:01PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > On 12.11.23 01:46, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > > I had been testing some things on a post 6.6-rc5 kernel for a week or
> > > two and then when I pulled to a post 6.6 release kernel, I found that
> > > system suspend was broken.  It seems that the radeon driver failed to
> > > suspend, leaving the display dead, the wayland display server hung, and
> > > the system still running.  I have been trying to bisect it for the last
> > > few days and have only been able to narrow it down to the following 3
> > > commits:
> > >
> > > There are only 'skip'ped commits left to test.
> > > The first bad commit could be any of:
> > > 56e449603f0ac580700621a356d35d5716a62ce5
> > > c07bf1636f0005f9eb7956404490672286ea59d3
> > > b70438004a14f4d0f9890b3297cd66248728546c
> > > We cannot bisect more!
> >
> > Hmm, not a single reply from the amdgpu folks. Wondering how we can
> > encourage them to look into this.
> >
> > Phillip, reporting issues by mail should still work, but you might have
> > more luck here, as that's where the amdgpu afaics prefer to track bugs:
> > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues
> >
> > When you file an issue there, please mention it here.
> >
> > Furthermore it might help if you could verify if 6.7-rc1 (or rc2, which
> > comes out later today) or 6.6.2-rc1 improve things.
> 
> It would also be good to test if reverting any of these is possible or not.
> 

Hi Dave,

AFAIK commit c07bf1636f0005 ("MAINTAINERS: Update the GPU Scheduler email")
doesn't seem to do with this regression as it doesn't change any amdgpu code
that may introduce the regression.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature