Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()

From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Sat Nov 18 2023 - 02:00:50 EST


Le 17/11/2023 à 12:14, Александра Дюпина a écrit :
I'm sorry, I forgot to add "return ret;" after
calling the dev_err() function. Before I post
the second version of the patch, please let me
know what you think about this fix, keeping in
mind what I wanted to add "return ret;"

This is a probe function.
So, maybe using dev_err_probe() would be slightly nicer?

If yes, the dev_err() that is already there could be updated as well in an other patch.

CJ


17.11.2023 10:49, Alexandra Diupina пишет:
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() may return an errno, so
add a return value check

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 8410e7f3b31e ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider")
Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index c8a7ccc42c16..4037945663bf 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -334,8 +334,13 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
  #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
      /* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
-    if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
-        devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
+    if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells")) {
+        ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
+        if (ret) {
+            dev_err(dev, "%s: registering clock provider failed, err: %d\n",
+                __func__, ret);
+        }
+    }
  #endif
      ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&scmi_cpufreq_driver);


Regards,

Alexandra Diupina