Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: scmi: process the result of devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider()

From: Александра Дюпина
Date: Fri Nov 17 2023 - 06:14:34 EST


I'm sorry, I forgot to add "return ret;" after
calling the dev_err() function. Before I post
the second version of the patch, please let me
know what you think about this fix, keeping in
mind what I wanted to add "return ret;"

17.11.2023 10:49, Alexandra Diupina пишет:
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() may return an errno, so
add a return value check

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: 8410e7f3b31e ("cpufreq: scmi: Fix OPP addition failure with a dummy clock provider")
Signed-off-by: Alexandra Diupina <adiupina@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
index c8a7ccc42c16..4037945663bf 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c
@@ -334,8 +334,13 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
- if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
- devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
+ if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells")) {
+ ret = devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%s: registering clock provider failed, err: %d\n",
+ __func__, ret);
+ }
+ }
#endif
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&scmi_cpufreq_driver);


Regards,

Alexandra Diupina