Re: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for SM8550

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 23:53, Bibek Kumar Patro
<quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add ACTLR data table for SM8550 along with support for
> same including SM8550 specific implementation operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> index 68c1f4908473..590b7c285299 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,64 @@ struct actlr_data {
>         u32 actlr;
>  };
>
> +static const struct actlr_data sm8550_apps_actlr_data[] = {
> +       { 0x18a0, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x18e0, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x0800, 0x0020, 0x00000001 },
> +       { 0x1800, 0x00c0, 0x00000001 },
> +       { 0x1820, 0x0000, 0x00000001 },
> +       { 0x1860, 0x0000, 0x00000001 },
> +       { 0x0c01, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c02, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c03, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c04, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c05, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c06, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c07, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c08, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c09, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c0c, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c0d, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c0e, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x0c0f, 0x0020, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1961, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1962, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1963, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1964, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1965, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1966, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1967, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1968, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1969, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x196c, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x196d, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x196e, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x196f, 0x0000, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c1, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c2, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c3, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c4, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c5, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c6, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c7, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c8, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19c9, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19cc, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19cd, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19ce, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x19cf, 0x0010, 0x00000303 },
> +       { 0x1c00, 0x0002, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1c01, 0x0000, 0x00000001 },
> +       { 0x1920, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1923, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1924, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1940, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1941, 0x0004, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1943, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1944, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +       { 0x1947, 0x0000, 0x00000103 },
> +};

This is nearly impossible to handle.
Please add defines for 0x1, 0x103 and 0x303. Also please consider
adding comments for the devices.

> +
>  static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>  {
>         return container_of(smmu, struct qcom_smmu, smmu);
> @@ -444,6 +502,16 @@ static const struct arm_smmu_impl sdm845_smmu_500_impl = {
>         .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
>  };
>
> +
> +static const struct arm_smmu_impl sm8550_smmu_500_impl = {
> +       .init_context = qcom_smmu_init_context,
> +       .cfg_probe = qcom_smmu_cfg_probe,
> +       .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> +       .reset = arm_mmu500_reset,
> +       .write_s2cr = qcom_smmu_write_s2cr,
> +       .tlb_sync = qcom_smmu_tlb_sync,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct arm_smmu_impl qcom_adreno_smmu_v2_impl = {
>         .init_context = qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context,
>         .def_domain_type = qcom_smmu_def_domain_type,
> @@ -507,6 +575,11 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_config qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg = {
>         .reg_offset = qcom_smmu_impl0_reg_offset,
>  };
>
> +static const struct actlr_config sm8550_actlrcfg = {
> +       .adata = sm8550_apps_actlr_data,
> +       .size = ARRAY_SIZE(sm8550_apps_actlr_data),
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * It is not yet possible to use MDP SMMU with the bypass quirk on the msm8996,
>   * there are not enough context banks.
> @@ -530,16 +603,20 @@ static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sdm845_smmu_500_data = {
>         /* Also no debug configuration. */
>  };
>
> +
> +static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data sm8550_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
> +       .impl = &sm8550_smmu_500_impl,
> +       .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
> +       .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
> +       .actlrcfg = &sm8550_actlrcfg,
> +};

This structure doesn't seem to be linked. Did you test your patches?

> +
>  static const struct qcom_smmu_match_data qcom_smmu_500_impl0_data = {
>         .impl = &qcom_smmu_500_impl,
>         .adreno_impl = &qcom_adreno_smmu_500_impl,
>         .cfg = &qcom_smmu_impl0_cfg,
>  };
>
> -/*
> - * Do not add any more qcom,SOC-smmu-500 entries to this list, unless they need
> - * special handling and can not be covered by the qcom,smmu-500 entry.
> - */

Leave the comment in place.

>  static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused qcom_smmu_impl_of_match[] = {
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8996-smmu-v2", .data = &msm8996_smmu_data },
>         { .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-smmu-v2", .data = &qcom_smmu_v2_data },
> --
> 2.17.1
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry