Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: int3472: don't use gpiod_toggle_active_low()

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 9/28/23 20:40, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 14:40, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is a v2 of Bartosz' "don't use gpiod_toggle_active_low()" series.
>>
>> New in v2:
>> - Rework to deal with ACPI path vs gpiod_lookup.key differences:
>>   acpi_get_handle(path) -> acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle) -> acpi_dev_name(adev)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>> Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
>>   platform/x86: int3472: Add new
>>     skl_int3472_gpiod_get_from_temp_lookup() helper
>>   gpio: acpi: remove acpi_get_and_request_gpiod()
>>
>> Hans de Goede (3):
>>   platform/x86: int3472: Add new skl_int3472_fill_gpiod_lookup() helper
>>   platform/x86: int3472: Stop using gpiod_toggle_active_low()
>>   platform/x86: int3472: Switch to devm_get_gpiod()
>>
>>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c                   |  28 -----
>>  .../x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c     |  54 ++--------
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h   |   7 +-
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 101 ++++++++++++++----
>>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c      |  24 +----
>>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h                 |   8 --
>>  6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.41.0
>>
> 
> Thanks Hans, this looks good to me. I'd let it sit on the list for a
> week. After that, do you want to take patches 1-4 and provide me with
> another tag?

That sounds like a good plan to me, will do.

Regards,

Hans