Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: int3472: don't use gpiod_toggle_active_low()

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Thu, 28 Sept 2023 at 14:40, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a v2 of Bartosz' "don't use gpiod_toggle_active_low()" series.
>
> New in v2:
> - Rework to deal with ACPI path vs gpiod_lookup.key differences:
>   acpi_get_handle(path) -> acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(handle) -> acpi_dev_name(adev)
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
>   platform/x86: int3472: Add new
>     skl_int3472_gpiod_get_from_temp_lookup() helper
>   gpio: acpi: remove acpi_get_and_request_gpiod()
>
> Hans de Goede (3):
>   platform/x86: int3472: Add new skl_int3472_fill_gpiod_lookup() helper
>   platform/x86: int3472: Stop using gpiod_toggle_active_low()
>   platform/x86: int3472: Switch to devm_get_gpiod()
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c                   |  28 -----
>  .../x86/intel/int3472/clk_and_regulator.c     |  54 ++--------
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/common.h   |   7 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/discrete.c | 101 ++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/int3472/led.c      |  24 +----
>  include/linux/gpio/consumer.h                 |   8 --
>  6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>

Thanks Hans, this looks good to me. I'd let it sit on the list for a
week. After that, do you want to take patches 1-4 and provide me with
another tag?

Bart