Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916-samsung-j5: Add sound and modem

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 26.09.2023 18:51, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> From: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Enable sound and modem for the Samsung J5 smartphones. The setup is
> similar to most MSM8916 devices, i.e.:
> 
>  - QDSP6 audio
>  - Speaker/earpiece/headphones/microphones via digital/analog codec
>    in MSM8916/PM8916
>  - WWAN Internet via BAM-DMUX
> 
> except:
> 
>  - There is no secondary microphone, so a different "model" is used to
>    differentiate that in the UCM configuration.
>  - Samsung-specific audio jack detection (not supported yet)
> 
> Co-developed-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: "Lin, Meng-Bo" <linmengbo0689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [Stephan: Add consistent commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5.dts         |  4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> index fe59be3505fe..2caa820b0c26 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>  
>  #include "msm8916-pm8916.dtsi"
> +#include "msm8916-modem-qdsp6.dtsi"
> +
>  #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/input/input.h>
>  #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> @@ -135,6 +137,10 @@ &blsp_uart2 {
>  	status = "okay";
>  };
>  
> +&mpss_mem {
> +	reg = <0x0 0x86800000 0x0 0x5800000>;
> +};
> +
>  &pm8916_resin {
>  	status = "okay";
>  	linux,code = <KEY_VOLUMEDOWN>;
> @@ -154,6 +160,15 @@ &sdhc_2 {
>  	cd-gpios = <&tlmm 38 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
>  };
>  
> +&sound {
> +	model = "msm8916-1mic";
That's.. vague.. Is that intended?

I also noticed only now that random patches have status
at random places in the property tree.. Removing the disablement
would aid that as well (wink wink)!

Konrad