Re: dma_map_resource() has a bad performance in pcie peer to peer transactions when iommu enabled in Linux

From: Christian König
Date: Mon Sep 25 2023 - 13:58:43 EST


Am 25.09.23 um 16:17 schrieb Kelly Devilliv:
On 2023-09-25 04:59, Kelly Devilliv wrote:
Dear all,

I am working on an ARM-V8 server with two gpu cards on it. Recently, I need
to test pcie peer to peer communication between the two gpu cards, but the
throughput is only 4GB/s.
After I explored the gpu's kernel mode driver, I found it was using the
dma_map_resource() API to map the peer device's MMIO space. The arm
iommu driver then will hardcode a 'IOMMU_MMIO' prot in the later dma map:
static dma_addr_t iommu_dma_map_resource(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t phys,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction
dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
return __iommu_dma_map(dev, phys, size,
dma_info_to_prot(dir, false,
attrs) | IOMMU_MMIO,
dma_get_mask(dev));
}

And that will finally set the 'ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_DEV' attribute in PTE,
which may have a negative impact on the performance of the pcie peer to peer
transactions.
/*
* Note that this logic is structured to accommodate Mali LPAE
* having stage-1-like attributes but stage-2-like permissions.
*/
if (data->iop.fmt == ARM_64_LPAE_S2 ||
data->iop.fmt == ARM_32_LPAE_S2) {
if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO)
pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_DEV;
else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE)
pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_OIWB;
else
pte |= ARM_LPAE_PTE_MEMATTR_NC;
} else {
if (prot & IOMMU_MMIO)
pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_DEV
<< ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT);
else if (prot & IOMMU_CACHE)
pte |= (ARM_LPAE_MAIR_ATTR_IDX_CACHE
<< ARM_LPAE_PTE_ATTRINDX_SHIFT);
}

I tried to remove the 'IOMMU_MMIO' prot in the dma_map_resource() API
and re-compile the linux kernel, the throughput then can be up to 28GB/s.
Is there an elegant way to solve this issue without modifying the linux kernel?
e.g., a substitution of dma_map_resource() API?

Not really. Other use-cases for dma_map_resource() include DMA offload
engines accessing FIFO registers, where allowing reordering, write-gathering,
etc. would be a terrible idea. Thus it needs to assume a "safe" MMIO memory
type, which on Arm means Device-nGnRE.

However, the "proper" PCI peer-to-peer support under CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA
ended up moving away from the dma_map_resource() approach anyway, and
allows this kind of device memory to be treated more like regular memory (via
ZONE_DEVICE) rather than arbitrary MMIO resources, so your best bet would
be to get the GPU driver converted over to using that.
Thanks Robin.
So your suggestion is we'd better work out a new implementation just as what it
does under CONFIG_PCI_P2PDMA instead of just using the dma_map_resource()
API?

I have explored the GPU drivers from AMD, Nvidia and habanalabs, e.g., and found
they all using the dma_map_resource() API to map the peer device's bar address.
If so, is it possible to be a common performance issue in PCI peer-to-peer scenario?

That's not an issue, but expected behavior.

When you enable IOMMU every transaction needs to go through the root complex for address translation and you completely lose the performance benefit of PCIe P2P.

This is a hardware limitation and not really related to dma_map_resource() in any way.

Regards,
Christian.


Thanks,
Robin.

Thank you!

Platform info:
Linux kernel version: 5.10
PCIE GEN4 x16

Sincerely,
Kelly