Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] tools/nolibc: i386: Fix a stack misalign bug on _start

From: Thomas Weißschuh
Date: Sun Aug 27 2023 - 03:00:27 EST


Hi Ammar,

On 2023-08-26 21:16:32+0700, Ammar Faizi wrote:
> The ABI mandates that the %esp register must be a multiple of 16 when
> executing a call instruction.
>
> Commit 2ab446336b17 simplified the _start function, but it didn't take

Afaik references to commits in commit messages are supposed to follow
the same format as in the Fixes: tag.

"Commit 2ab446336b17 ("tools/nolibc: i386: shrink _start with _start_c")
simplified the _start function, [...]"

> care of the %esp alignment, causing SIGSEGV on SSE and AVX programs that
> use aligned move instruction (e.g., movdqa, movaps, and vmovdqa).
>
> Ensure the %esp is a multiple of 16 when executing the call instruction.
>
> Cc: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 2ab446336b17aad362c6decee29b4efd83a01979 ("tools/nolibc: i386: shrink _start with _start_c")
> Reported-by: Nicholas Rosenberg <inori@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ammar Faizi <ammarfaizi2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
> index 64415b9fac77f996..4edf238eeac67aa2 100644
> --- a/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
> +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h
> @@ -167,7 +167,8 @@ void __attribute__((weak, noreturn, optimize("Os", "omit-frame-pointer"))) __no_
> __asm__ volatile (
> "xor %ebp, %ebp\n" /* zero the stack frame */
> "mov %esp, %eax\n" /* save stack pointer to %eax, as arg1 of _start_c */
> - "and $-16, %esp\n" /* last pushed argument must be 16-byte aligned */
> + "and $-16, %esp\n" /* align stack to 16 bytes */
> + "sub $12, %esp\n" /* last pushed argument must be 16-byte aligned */
> "push %eax\n" /* push arg1 on stack to support plain stack modes too */
> "call _start_c\n" /* transfer to c runtime */
> "hlt\n" /* ensure it does not return */

Thanks for the fix!

In general:

Acked-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Though I'd like to have the following part of your follow-up mail as
part of the commit message [0]:

"""
When the call main is executed, the
%esp is 16 bytes aligned.

Then, on function entry (%esp mod 16) == 12
because the call instruction pushes 4 bytes
onto the stack.

subl $12, %esp will make (%esp mod 16) == 0
again.
"""

It's much clearer to someone not that familiar with ASM and its
intricacies; like me.

Also a Link: tag for the Reported-by: would be nice.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZOoindMFj1UKqo+s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/


Thomas