Re: [PATCH] riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issue between gcc and binutils

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Tue Jul 25 2023 - 14:58:04 EST


On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:23:44AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi Mingzheng,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:04:05AM +0800, Mingzheng Xing wrote:
> > When compiling the kernel with the toolchain composed of GCC >= 12.1.0 and
> > binutils < 2.38, default ISA spec used when building binutils and GCC, the
> > following build failure will appear because the
> > CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI is not turned on.
> > (i.e, gcc-12.1.0 and binutils-2.36, or gcc-12.3.0 and binutils-2.37, use
> > default ISA spec.)
> >
> > CC arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vgettimeofday.o
> > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h: Assembler messages:
> > <<BUILDDIR>>/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/gettimeofday.h:79: Error: unrecognized opcode `csrr a5,0xc01'
>
> The gift that keeps on giving :/
>
> > Binutils has updated the default ISA spec version, and the community has
> > responded well to this[1][2][3], but it appears that this is not over yet.
> >
> > We also need to consider the situation of binutils < 2.38 but
> > GCC >= 12.1.0, since the combination between different versions of GCC and
> > binutils is not unique, which is to some extent flexible. GCC release
> > 12.1.0 updated the default ISA spec version in GCC commit[4].
>
> I suspect this combination is not too common because binutils 2.38 came
> out before GCC 12.1.0 but as you note, it is obviously possible. What
> toolchain has this combination in the wild, which would be helpful for
> documentation purposes?

Yeah, that'd be great to know, at least the other niche stuff that we
are working around had a clear use-case (testing LLVM in debian containers)
whereas there's no clear user for this.
That's doubly interesting, as this patch seems to break things for binutils
< 2.35, and if we have to make a trade-off between those too, then it'd
be good to be able to weigh up the options.
Do we perhaps need the misa-spec workaround instead for this case?
Haven't tested that though, trying to dig myself out of email backlog.

> > For more information, please refer to:
> >
> > commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build with binutils 2.38")
> > commit e89c2e815e76 ("riscv: Handle zicsr/zifencei issues between clang and binutils")
> >
> > [1]: https://groups.google.com/a/groups.riscv.org/g/sw-dev/c/aE1ZeHHCYf4
> > [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230308220842.1231003-1-conor@xxxxxxxxxx
> > [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230223220546.52879-1-conor@xxxxxxxxxx
> > [4]: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51b5b52fec2cd

btw, please make these regular Link: tags (with a [N] at EOL) and drop
the space between them and the sign off. Also, this probably needs to be
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx too.

Cheers,
Conor.

> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mingzheng Xing <xingmingzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 6 +++++-
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 4c07b9189c86..b49cea30f6cc 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -570,11 +570,15 @@ config TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZIHINTPAUSE
> > config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI
> > def_bool y
> > # https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=aed44286efa8ae8717a77d94b51ac3614e2ca6dc
> > - depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800
> > + # https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=98416dbb0a62579d4a7a4a76bab51b5b52fec2cd
> > + depends on CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 120100 || \
> > + AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800
>
> GCC_VERSION will be 0 for clang, so you don't need the CC_IS_GCC check.
> With that change, this should be able to stay on one line:
>
> depends on GCC_VERSION >= 120100 || (AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800)
>
> > help
> > Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which
> > moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei
> > extensions.
> > + Similarly, GCC release 12.1.0 has changed the default ISA spec version to
> > + 20191213, so the above situation requires this option to be enabled.
> >
> > config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_OLD_ISA_SPEC
> > def_bool y
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature