Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add erratum 3.14 for 88E6390X and 88E6190X

From: Paolo Abeni
Date: Tue Jul 25 2023 - 04:57:38 EST


On Fri, 2023-07-21 at 12:26 +0200, Ante Knezic wrote:
> Fixes XAUI/RXAUI lane alignment errors.
> Issue causes dropped packets when trying to communicate over
> fiber via SERDES lanes of port 9 and 10.
> Errata document applies only to 88E6190X and 88E6390X devices.
> Requires poking in undocumented registers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ante Knezic <ante.knezic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V3 : Rework to fit the new phylink_pcs infrastructure
> V2 : Rework as suggested by Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxx>
> * make int lanes[] const
> * reorder prod_nums
> * update commit message to indicate we are dealing with
> undocumented Marvell registers and magic values
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/pcs-639x.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/pcs-639x.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/pcs-639x.c
> index 98dd49dac421..50b14804c360 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/pcs-639x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/pcs-639x.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct mv88e639x_pcs {
> struct mdio_device mdio;
> struct phylink_pcs sgmii_pcs;
> struct phylink_pcs xg_pcs;
> + struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip;
> bool supports_5g;
> phy_interface_t interface;
> unsigned int irq;
> @@ -205,13 +206,52 @@ static void mv88e639x_sgmii_pcs_pre_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
> mv88e639x_sgmii_pcs_control_pwr(mpcs, false);
> }
>
> +static int mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(struct mv88e639x_pcs *mpcs)
> +{
> + const int lanes[] = { MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE1,
> + MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT9_LANE3,
> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE0, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE1,
> + MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE2, MV88E6390_PORT10_LANE3 };
> + struct mdio_device mdio;
> + int err, i;
> +
> + /* 88e6190x and 88e6390x errata 3.14:
> + * After chip reset, SERDES reconfiguration or SERDES core
> + * Software Reset, the SERDES lanes may not be properly aligned
> + * resulting in CRC errors
> + */
> +
> + mdio.bus = mpcs->mdio.bus;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lanes); i++) {
> + mdio.addr = lanes[i];
> +
> + err = mdiodev_c45_write(&mdio, MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> + 0xf054, 0x400C);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + err = mdiodev_c45_write(&mdio, MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> + 0xf054, 0x4000);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int mv88e639x_sgmii_pcs_post_config(struct phylink_pcs *pcs,
> phy_interface_t interface)
> {
> struct mv88e639x_pcs *mpcs = sgmii_pcs_to_mv88e639x_pcs(pcs);
> + struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = mpcs->chip;
>
> mv88e639x_sgmii_pcs_control_pwr(mpcs, true);
>
> + if (chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6190X ||
> + chip->info->prod_num == MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390X)
> + mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(mpcs);

It looks like you are ignoring the errors reported by
mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(). Should the above be:

return mv88e6390_erratum_3_14(mpcs);

instead?

Thanks!

Paolo