Re: [patch 48/58] x86/apic: Nuke ack_APIC_irq()

From: Wei Liu
Date: Sun Jul 23 2023 - 18:45:58 EST

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the file-locks tree"
Previous message: Wei Liu: "Re: [patch 47/58] x86/apic: Remove pointless arguments from [native_]eoi_write()"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch 48/58] x86/apic: Nuke ack_APIC_irq()"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch 56/58] x86/apic: Wrap IPI calls into helper functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 01:15:49AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Yet another wrapper of a wrapper gone along with the outdated comment
> that this compiles to a single instruction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

Next message: Stephen Rothwell: "linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the file-locks tree"
Previous message: Wei Liu: "Re: [patch 47/58] x86/apic: Remove pointless arguments from [native_]eoi_write()"
In reply to: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch 48/58] x86/apic: Nuke ack_APIC_irq()"
Next in thread: Thomas Gleixner: "[patch 56/58] x86/apic: Wrap IPI calls into helper functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]