Re: [PATCH] kthread: Rename user_mode_thread() to kmuser_thread()

[Huacai Chen]

Hi, Eric,

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 8:43 PM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi, Luis,
>
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 7:25 AM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 04:55:33PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > > Friendly ping?
> >
> > You want to cc the folks who Nacked your patch. Until then, this
> > probably can't go further.
> Thank you very much. Eric and Andrew are already in the CC list, so
> add Thomas now.
>
> My brain is a little old-fashioned so I insisted that "a thread
> without mm_struct should be a kernel thread" in the previous patch.
> Unfortunately this makes Eric and Thomas unhappy, I'm very sorry for
> that.
>
> During the discussion of the previous patch I know I made some
> mistakes about some basic concepts, but I also found the name
> "user_mode_thread()" is somewhat confusing. I think rename it to
> kmuser_thread() is better, because:
> 1, it identify init and umh as user threads;
> 2, it points out that init and umh are special user threads that run
> in kernel mode before loading a user program.
>
> Sorry for my rudeness again.
Excuse me, but could you please tell me what your opinion is. In my
opinion a typical user thread is created by
pthread_create()/sys_clone(), it is better to distinguish typical user
threads from init and umh.

Huacai
>
> Huacai
> >
> >   Luis