RE: [v2 PATCH] arm64: dts: stratix10: add new compatible for Intel SoCFPGA Stratix10 platform

[Li, Meng]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2023 4:54 PM
> To: Li, Meng <Meng.Li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] arm64: dts: stratix10: add new compatible for Intel
> SoCFPGA Stratix10 platform
> 
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
> 
> On 21/07/2023 10:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 21/07/2023 10:38, Meng Li wrote:
> >> Intel Stratix10 is very the same with Agilex platform, the DWC2 IP on
> >> the Stratix platform also does not support clock-gating. The commit
> >> 3d8d3504d233("usb: dwc2: Add platform specific data for Intel's
> >> Agilex") had fixed this issue. So, add the essential compatible to
> >> also use the specific data on Stratix10 platform.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > From where did you get it?
> >
> > Did you just fake a tag to pass the review?
> 
> I just double checked my replies and this for sure never happened.
> 
> NAK, don't fake reviews. This very impolite and destroys entire trust.
> The model of upstream collaboration depends on the trust, which is now gone
> for Windriver.
> 

No! I don't fake a tag. 
In the v1 version, the subject is " usb: dwc2: add new compatible for Intel SoCFPGA Stratix10 platform"
But it is not reasonable, because the patch is for dts file. So I changed the subject to "arm64: dts: stratix10: "
And add SoC special compatible.

Thanks,
Limeng

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof