Re: [PATCH 04/11] iio: adc: Update bindings to remove support for ADC7 name used on QCOM PMICs

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Jul 08 2023 - 11:03:02 EST


On Sat, 8 Jul 2023 12:58:28 +0530
Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Now that usage of "ADC7" name has been replaced with usage of "ADC5
> Gen2" name everywhere, remove all support for "ADC7" name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml | 5 +-
> .../bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.yaml | 1 -
> .../dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h | 63 -------------
> .../dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350b.h | 88 -------------------
> .../dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h | 46 ----------
> .../dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735a.h | 28 ------
> .../dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735b.h | 28 ------
> include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-vadc.h | 76 ----------------
> 8 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 334 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350b.h
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735a.h
> delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735b.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml
> index f886977de165..eb7d16e385ad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/qcom,spmi-vadc.yaml
> @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties:
> - qcom,spmi-vadc
> - qcom,spmi-adc5
> - qcom,spmi-adc-rev2
> - - qcom,spmi-adc7
> - qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
>
> reg:
> @@ -214,9 +213,7 @@ allOf:
> properties:
> compatible:
> contains:
> - enum :
> - - qcom,spmi-adc7
> - - qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
> + const: qcom,spmi-adc5-gen2
>
> then:
> patternProperties:

Hmm. Definitely can't drop support (as per comment on next patch).
I think you should just mark it deprecated rather than remove it here but maybe
you can drop it. Let's see what DT binding maintainers say.

Jonathan