Re: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: Fix potential deadlock on &sde->flushlist_lock

[Chengfeng Ye]

> Exactly, we already called to spin_lock_irqsave(), there is no value in
> doing it twice.

Oh yeah, I just notice that the lock acquisition of &sde->flushlist_lock
is always nested inside &sde->tail_lock due to the goto. Then it is true
that no need for irq invariant lock/unlock on &sde->flushlist_lock.

Thanks much for your reply and your time.

Best Regards,
Chengfeng