Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: serial: amlogic,meson-uart: Add compatible string for T7

[Lucas Tanure]

On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 7:05 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22/06/2023 07:32, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:12 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Lucas,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:53:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On 21/06/2023 15:32, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >>>> Amlogic T7 SoCs uses the same UART controller as S4 SoCs and G12A.
> >>>> There is no need for an extra compatible line in the driver, but
> >>>> add T7 compatible line for documentation.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanure@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml          | 2 ++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> >>>> index 01ec45b3b406..860ab58d87b0 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
> >>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
> >>>>                - amlogic,meson8b-uart
> >>>>                - amlogic,meson-gx-uart
> >>>>                - amlogic,meson-s4-uart
> >>>> +              - amlogic,meson-t7-uart
> >>>>            - const: amlogic,meson-ao-uart
> >>>>        - description: Always-on power domain UART controller on G12A SoCs
> >>>>          items:
> >>>> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
> >>>>            - amlogic,meson8b-uart
> >>>>            - amlogic,meson-gx-uart
> >>>>            - amlogic,meson-s4-uart
> >>>> +          - amlogic,meson-t7-uart
> >>>
> >>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
> >>> `make dtbs_check` (see
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
> >>> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
> >>> for instructions).
> >>
> >> Check back on the previous version, I should've posted an untested
> >> version of what you need to add.
> > I saw that, but adding a S4 doesn't make sense to me. And you didn't
> > show the entire change, so I can't understand what you want there.
>
> For sure you need something which does not trigger errors. If you claim
> adding S4 as fallback does not make sense, then why did you use it?
> Sending a code which is clearly incorrect does not make sense.
>
Sorry, I think we are talking about different things. It does not make
sense to me to add an S4 line in the documentation when it is already
there. So I could not understand or make sense of the patch Conor sent
in reply to my V2.

Krzysztof, I will check again with dtbs_check and re-send.

>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>