Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: serial: amlogic,meson-uart: Add compatible string for T7

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 22/06/2023 07:32, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:12 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Lucas,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 03:53:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 21/06/2023 15:32, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>>>> Amlogic T7 SoCs uses the same UART controller as S4 SoCs and G12A.
>>>> There is no need for an extra compatible line in the driver, but
>>>> add T7 compatible line for documentation.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanure@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml          | 2 ++
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
>>>> index 01ec45b3b406..860ab58d87b0 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/amlogic,meson-uart.yaml
>>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
>>>>                - amlogic,meson8b-uart
>>>>                - amlogic,meson-gx-uart
>>>>                - amlogic,meson-s4-uart
>>>> +              - amlogic,meson-t7-uart
>>>>            - const: amlogic,meson-ao-uart
>>>>        - description: Always-on power domain UART controller on G12A SoCs
>>>>          items:
>>>> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ properties:
>>>>            - amlogic,meson8b-uart
>>>>            - amlogic,meson-gx-uart
>>>>            - amlogic,meson-s4-uart
>>>> +          - amlogic,meson-t7-uart
>>>
>>> It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
>>> `make dtbs_check` (see
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
>>> https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
>>> for instructions).
>>
>> Check back on the previous version, I should've posted an untested
>> version of what you need to add.
> I saw that, but adding a S4 doesn't make sense to me. And you didn't
> show the entire change, so I can't understand what you want there.

For sure you need something which does not trigger errors. If you claim
adding S4 as fallback does not make sense, then why did you use it?
Sending a code which is clearly incorrect does not make sense.


Best regards,
Krzysztof