Re: [PATCH v6 18/22] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Separate out interconnect bus clocks

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Thu Jun 15 2023 - 03:51:04 EST


On 15.06.2023 02:48, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2023-06-14 11:04:37)
>> The interconnect bus clocks are now handled within the ICC framework.
>> They still however need to get a kickstart *before* we call
>> clk_smd_rpm_enable_scaling(), or RPM will assume that they should all
>> be running at 0 kHz and the system will inevitably die.
>>
>> Separate them out to ensure such a kickstart can still take place.
>>
>> As a happy accident, the file got smaller:
>>
>> Total: Before=41951, After=41555, chg -0.94%
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++------------------------
>> 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+), 163 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>> index 6e7f0438e8b8..0d1d97659d59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
>> @@ -498,13 +506,69 @@ DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(div_clk1, 11, 19200000);
>> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(div_clk2, 12, 19200000);
>> DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM_XO_BUFFER(div_clk3, 13, 19200000);
>>
>> +static struct clk_smd_rpm *bimc_pcnoc_icc_clks[] = {
>
> Can these be const arrays?
Sorta, look below.

>
>> + &clk_smd_rpm_bimc_clk,
>> + &clk_smd_rpm_bus_0_pcnoc_clk,
>> +};
>> +
> [...]
>> @@ -1332,6 +1275,15 @@ static int rpm_smd_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> + for (i = 0; i < desc->num_icc_clks; i++) {
>> + if (!desc->icc_clks[i])
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ret = clk_smd_rpm_handoff(desc->icc_clks[i]);
>
> This API can probably take a const struct clk_smd_rpm pointer as well.
It would be great, but ideally we want to set r->enabled in that func
for !bus clocks (for unused clk cleanup). I could probably introduce a
separate function for the icc clocks that takes const.

Konrad