Re: [PATCH net v2 2/7] net: dsa: mt7530: fix trapping frames with multiple CPU ports on MT7530

[Arınç ÜNAL]

On 13.06.2023 21:12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 20:58:33 +0300 Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> > > Ok. I see Russell has commented on v4, though I don't see that he particularly
> > > pointed out that this fixes a problem which isn't yet a problem. I got lost in
> > > all the versions. v2 and v3 are out of my inbox now :)
> >
> > All good, I had to quickly roll v3 as v2 had wrong author information
> > and I couldn't risk getting v2 applied.
>
> FWIW you can reply with pw-bot: changes-requested to your own patches
> and the bot should discard them from patchwork.
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#updating-patch-status
>
> It's a new capability that nobody has used, yet, so YMMV :)

Interesting, I've got some questions regarding this.

> For example to mark a series as Changes Requested one needs to send the following line anywhere in the email thread:
>
> pw-bot: changes-requested

I suppose a reply to the cover letter or under the cover letter thread 
applies?

> The use of the bot is restricted to authors of the patches (the From: header on patch submission and command must match!)

So, for example, if this patch series was new, Vladimir would reply to 
the patch they're the author of with 'pw-bot: changes-requested', and 
the patchworks would mark the whole patch series as changes requested?

Arınç