Re: nolibc patches, still possible for 6.5 ?

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 06:32:04AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 04:06:37PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 11:22:54PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 02:03:17PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > (There were some kernel test
> > > > > > robot complaints as well, valid or not I am not sure.)
> > > > > 
> > > > > You mean in relation with nolibc stuff (or nolibc-test) or something
> > > > > totally different ?
> > > > 
> > > > Apologies, this was me being confused and failing to look closely.
> > > > 
> > > > The complaints were not about nolibc, but rather about my patches that
> > > > they were on top of.  Not your problem!
> > > 
> > > Ah no problem :-)
> > > 
> > > > And please let me know when the next batch from your tree are ready to go.
> > > > (You might have been saying that they were in your recent emails, but
> > > > I thought I should double-check.)
> > > 
> > > No pb, I just sent it while you were writing and our emails have crossed :-)
> > > 
> > > In short, it's ready now with branch 20230606-nolibc-rv32+stkp7a but if you
> > > need any more info (more detailed summary, a public repost of the whole
> > > series etc), just let me know. And I faced 2 kernel build errors on s390x
> > > and riscv about rcu_task something, though you might be interested :-/
> > 
> > And I pulled them in and got this from "make run":
> > 
> > 138 test(s) passed, 0 skipped, 0 failed.[    2.416045] reboot: Power down
> > 
> > And this from "make run-user":
> > 
> > 136 test(s) passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed. See all results in /home/git/linux-rcu/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run.out
> > 
> > And run.out looks as it has before, so all looks good at this end.
> > 
> > Thus, unless you tell me otherwise, I will move these to my nolibc branch
> > for the upcoming merge window.
> 
> Perfect, thank you very much Paul!

And done!

							Thanx, Paul