Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf/arm_cspmu: Decouple APMT dependency

[Suzuki K Poulose]

On 01/06/2023 12:59, Robin Murphy wrote:
> The functional paths of the driver need not care about ACPI, so abstract
> the property of atomic doubleword access as its own flag (repacking the
> structure for a better fit). We also do not need to go poking directly
> at the APMT for standard resources which the ACPI layer has already
> dealt with, so deal with the optional MMIO page and interrupt in the
> normal firmware-agnostic manner. The few remaining portions of probing
> that *are* APMT-specific can still easily retrieve the APMT pointer as
> needed without us having to carry a duplicate copy around everywhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>