Re: ntfs orphan? (was Re: [PATCH] ntfs: do not dereference a null ctx on error)

[Namjae Jeon]

2023-05-04 6:06 GMT+09:00, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 3 May 2023 11:16:02 +0700 Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 07, 2023 at 07:44:33PM +0000, Danila Chernetsov wrote:
>> > In ntfs_mft_data_extend_allocation_nolock(), if an error condition
>> > occurs
>> > prior to 'ctx' being set to a non-NULL value, avoid dereferencing the
>> > NULL
>> > 'ctx' pointer in error handling.
>> >
>> > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
>> Duplicate of 10-years-old outstanding patch at [1].
>
> Well, the patches are actually quite different.  Is Danila's longer one
> better?
Danila's patch is better than old one. old patch doesn't free
allocated cluster in error handling. And Christian will apply this to
his queue if you drop this patch.
>
>> I'm not speaking of the patch itself but rather on unfortunate state
>> of ntfs subsystem. It seems like the maintainer is MIA (has not
>> responding to patch submissions for a long time). Some trivial
>> patches, however, are merged through mm tree.
>>
>> Konstantin (from newer ntfs3 subsystem), Andrew, would you like to take a
>> look on this orphaned subsystem (and help reviewing)? I'd like to send
>> MAINTAINERS update if it turns out to be the case.
>>
>
> Sure, I can join linux-ntfs-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and hendle things
> which come along.
>
> Or Christian may want to do that?
>
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1358389709-20561-1-git-send-email-nickolai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
>
>